“Good
Morning, Angles.” The masculine voice emanating from the speaker box at the
Townsend agency assigns the detectives their next case. The female triumvirate
gather around and stare at the object directing them to execute an
investigation or solve a crime at the expense of their security. Women assuming
important leadership roles and expressing their feminist ideologies in the late
1970s prompted television (and other popular cultural production) to react to
this cultural dialogue by providing a forum for cultural critique where clashes
among polar ideological blocs evinced tensions. Charlie’s Angels arrives at an important historical point in time
where studies and representations about women are critically examined, thus
revealing the complex nature of embracing womanhood and negotiating ideologies
in a male-dominated society. Sarah Fawcett, one of the most popular Angels of
the many to work for Charlie, in the public mainstream, was revered as a
prototype of beauty and “power.” What power is precisely being interpreted?
While this is my reading, I do not believe women were complacent with the idea
that Fawcett was taking orders from a man in a box. Rather, it is possible that
this intangible “power” the actress possessed was the one enacted in the television
series by defying stereotypes. Her role in challenging women’s containment to
secretarial work by inserting herself in a phallocentric profession enables lengthy
conversations impossible to develop here. This power Fawcett radiated was one
where she (along with the other Angels) paved the way for women to enter a masculine
investigative field, and for television to create content around women assuming
non-limited careers. Listening to a box is problematic, but negotiating and
transforming a conservative ideology is the power of the expression.
Images courtesy of Google.
Images courtesy of Google.
No comments:
Post a Comment